Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Am J Health Behav ; 47(1): 87-97, 2023 02 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2264781

ABSTRACT

Objectives: In this study, we investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the decision-making process for impacted mandibular third molar removal and related clinical teaching. Methods: From April 21 to April 28, 2020, we distributed a self-constructed survey via the Wenjuanxing software platform to oral clinicians engaged in the extraction of mandibular third molars. Results: We received 321 valid responses. Overall, 22.4% of clinicians were temporarily not performing tooth extractions in outpatient clinics and 50.2% of clinicians were temporarily not performing impacted tooth extractions. The main reason cited was that aerosol-generating high-speed handpieces were not recommended for use during the pandemic, opting instead for the surgical handpiece with copious saline irrigation as the main method for bone removal; the hammer-and-chisel method was considered to be too traumatic and posed too high of a risk for iatrogenic injury. Conclusions: The implementation of disease control measures during the COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected clinical decision-making regarding impacted mandibular third molar extractions; the main reason cited was the contraindication of using aerosol-generating high-speed handpieces. The hammer-and-chisel method may represent a valuable surgical application under the requirements for epidemic prevention and control. We provide a new idea for the extraction of interrupted permanent molars in the context of epidemic prevention and control is provided.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Tooth, Impacted , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Pandemics/prevention & control , Tooth Extraction/methods , Mandible/surgery , Tooth, Impacted/surgery
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(7)2021 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1315800

ABSTRACT

A 72-year-old woman with a history of removal of a right hemimandibular keratocyst 10 years ago was referred to our attention for a large swelling of the right cheek. The orthopantomography and the CT scan showed a huge osteolytic area of the right mandibular ramus and angle. The patient's refusal to resection and reconstruction with a free flap pushed us towards a conservative treatment. The high probability of a iatrogenic mandibular fracture during and after surgery required the design of a customised titanium plate to be preliminary placed through cervical incision along the posterior border of the mandible. The patient successfully underwent the surgical positioning of the customised plate and subsequent removal of the keratocyst. She was discharged fit and well 5 days after surgery. She did not experience any infections, pathological fractures or relapse in the 6-month follow-up.


Subject(s)
Mandibular Fractures , Odontogenic Cysts , Aged , Female , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease/prevention & control , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Mandible/surgery , Mandibular Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Mandibular Fractures/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Odontogenic Cysts/diagnostic imaging , Odontogenic Cysts/surgery , Titanium , Weight-Bearing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL